New Findings from the IPCC

On Monday, the International Panel on Climate Change released the final installment of its Sixth Assessment Report.

Photo:
Ecos
Jonathan Good
Leans Left
Stephen Webber
Leans Right

In 1988, the United Nations established the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to assess and provide updates on climate change, its impact, and recommendations for addressing it. On Monday, the IPCC finished and released its Sixth Assessment Report. The body generally views keeping the planet from warming over 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels as a target, warning that any temperature rise beyond that would cause more frequent and severe extreme weather events. The organization’s reports offer policy-relevant scientific analysis, which it hopes can inform policymakers on how to move forward.

According to the report, global greenhouse gas emissions rose over the last decade, despite pledges to lower them. However, their growth rate has slowed some compared to the previous decade. Emissions increased across all industries, including the energy sector, where the growing use of renewables and more efficient power has failed to counteract population growth and industrial activity.

The authors warn that only immediate, significant climate action can keep the world below the 1.5 degrees threshold. According to their analysis, it requires global emissions to peak by 2025 and shrink dramatically after that. Forecasts show that current emissions trends would put Earth on the path to warming by 3.2 degrees. The report says that the only way to keep the planet below the 1.5 degrees target is to halve global emissions by the 2030s and reach net-zero emissions by the 2050s. This plan translates to 45% less gas, 60% less oil, and 95% less coal by 2050.

While the IPCC views 1.5 degrees as the ideal goal, it also considers the impact of a 2 degrees Celsius warming beyond pre-industrial levels — which many scientists regard as a less-desirable limit to prevent catastrophic effects. Both would require lifestyle shifts, from reducing the use of cars to favoring plant-based diets over meat. Its analysis also estimates that the policy change needed to hit the 2 degrees target would restrict global economic growth by up to 2.7% by 2050. However, the report’s authors say that limiting global warming would provide an overall economic benefit exceeding short-term costs. 

While some of its findings are grim, the report also highlights progress toward global climate goals. The lowering costs of more climate-friendly fossil fuel alternatives could lessen the financial burden of switching to renewable energy. Compared to 2010, both solar and wind power are significantly cheaper, and lithium-ion batteries — essential to the production of electric cars — have also fallen in price. This trend has led many countries to expand the use of renewable energy and electric vehicles.

Finally, the IPCC concludes that governments face several hurdles to enacting more robust climate policies — mainly political and financial ones. Policy shifts like ending fossil fuel subsidies or imposing carbon taxes — actions that the report suggests would direct investment toward renewable energy — face stiff opposition from political interest and lobbying groups. On other issues, like switching to nuclear power, leaders could face blowback from their constituents wary of such efforts. Also, the report argues that the global financial commitment needed to develop technology like carbon removal, which will be critical to meeting the 1.5 degrees goal, is far below necessary levels.

Climate change has played an increasing role in politics globally, and the United States is no exception. On Monday, the White House announced that the worsening impacts of climate change could cost $2 trillion each year by the end of the century. However, the administration’s proposed 2023 budget called for $45 billion in environmental initiatives, far short of the $555 billion in climate spending included in the President’s now-defeated Build Back Better plan. 

Climate activists say that is not enough. They suggest the IPCC’s findings highlight the need for drastic and widespread changes. Last August, congressional Democrats seized on an earlier portion of the IPCC report to push for a massive shift in American climate policy, something they will likely do again. Republican lawmakers have focused on climate-offending nations like China and Russia. Rep. Garret Graves (R-LA), who serves on the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, stated: “If we have learned anything from events over the last few months, it is that some countries — such as Russia, China, and others — have no respect for other countries, the environment, or human rights.”

To dive deeper into this issue, check out our Climate Change module.

Left Narrative

The IPCC report highlights what Democrats have long said: Climate change presents an existential threat to humanity, and governments must monumentally shift their approach to dealing with it. Republican obstructionists and climate change deniers must get on board with the Left’s efforts to avoid climate catastrophe. Funding for climate initiatives is an essential investment for future generations, and world powers must commit to providing those financial resources. While it will cost us in the short term, it is far better than the consequences of inaction. We must keep global warming below the 1.5 degrees target — the costs of not doing so are far too great.

Left-Lean Narrative

Right-Lean Narrative

Right Narrative

Two points can be seen from the release of the IPCC report: Russia and China are dangerous for the environment, and left-leaning climate activists want you to change your lifestyle instead of funding climate change solutions. The goals of the IPCC would require reducing the use of cars, living in smaller homes, and favoring plant-based diets over meat. Rather than funding technological developments like carbon sequestration (Clean Coal) and nuclear, Democrats are pushing a left-wing agenda causing inflation and increases in gas prices. Then, while Americans suffer, they tell you to buy an unaffordable electric vehicle.

Questions & Answers

Reading Comprehension

Have your students take a reading comprehension quiz to see how well they understood the article and different opinions.

Launch Activity

Discussion Questions

  1. Is having an international organization to address climate change a good idea? Why or why not?
  2. Is it possible for the world to reach its 1.5 degrees Celsius goal?
  3. Will the public accept the costs of addressing climate change? Why or why not?
  4. Are there any ways for leaders to make climate policies more politically acceptable? How?
  5. Why do you think the Biden administration’s budget proposal includes such relatively small climate funding compared to his Build Back Better bill, considering the White House warns climate change could eventually cost $2 trillion yearly?

Current Events in this story

Check out these current event pages for history, narratives, activities, and more:

Accompanying Content

min
Vox
What’s really holding the world back from stopping climate change

Vox covers the IPCC report’s primary findings and discusses the tools available to the international community to address climate change. However, it explains that those solutions take money and effort, and the world is running out of time for governments to act?

Article
Apr 4, 2022
Left
Bias
14
min
Lotus Eaters
Men Would Rather Die Than Stop Eating Meat

The Lotus Eaters podcast reviews a series of articles about meat consumption to rebuke left-leaning narratives about climate change lifestyles.

Podcast
Nov 27, 2021
Right
Bias
5
min
TED-Ed
What is the tragedy of the commons? - Nicholas Amendolare

TED-Ed explores how self-interest can negatively impact the common good in a pattern known as the tragedy of the commons. He discusses how this applies to real-life examples, including climate change.

Video
Nov 21, 2017
Center
Bias
12
min
SciShow
What Will the World Look Like, 2°C Warmer?

Hank Green highlights some of the changes the world may face if it warms by 2 degrees, using Vancouver, Canada and Kolkata, India as examples.

Video
May 14, 2020
Center
Bias
98
min
PBS NewsHour
WATCH LIVE: IPCC holds news conference on new climate change report

IPCC members explain some of the primary findings of their report and urge immediate action.

Video
Apr 4, 2022
Center
Bias
14
min
The Economist
Nuclear power: why is it so unpopular?

The Economist covers the historical reasons for nuclear power’s unpopularity.

Video
May 5, 2021
Leans Left
Bias

Recent Stories

See All